The Larkin family of Asheville keeps a wooden recipe box on top of the refrigerator. It contains 137 index cards, written in four hands across three generations. None of the recipes is famous. Most of them are for cake.
The oldest card, for a brown sugar pound cake, is in the hand of a great-grandmother who died in 1973. The newest is in the hand of a nine-year-old, written last August, for a recipe she invented for chocolate chip pancakes made with applesauce because they had run out of butter.
What is inherited along with the recipes is more than the recipes. It is the practice of writing them down. It is the assumption that, when a meal works, you make a card for it. It is the slow argument with cake.
There is a literature on the inheritance of property. There is a much smaller literature on the inheritance of things like the recipe box. The economist who has spent the most time on it, Charlotte Reiman at the LSE, calls these durable family practices and says they are more predictive of certain adult outcomes than parental income.
Reiman is careful not to overstate. The recipe box does not, in her data, produce happier or wealthier adults. It produces, more specifically, adults who are likely to maintain regular contact with siblings, who report having a place they consider home, and who are slightly more likely than the control to have a household practice they can name.
These are small effects. They are, in Reiman's words, the size of a recipe box.
Other families inherit other practices. The Donnelly family of Cleveland has, for sixty-one years, sent a single annual letter from the eldest sibling to all of the others on the first Sunday of Lent. The letter is read aloud at dinner. The youngest generation, now in their twenties, are starting to take over the writing.
The Cho family of Vancouver has a Saturday morning radio practice. The grandfather, who came from Busan in 1971, listened to CBC Radio 2 on Saturdays. His sons listened. His grandchildren listen, in their own kitchens, in three Canadian cities, separately but at the same time, and sometimes text each other when a song they all know comes on.
These practices are not nostalgic. They are not even, in most cases, conscious. The Larkins did not set out to teach their children to write recipes down. The Larkins wrote recipes down, and the children watched.
This is, in the broadest sense, what social learning theorists have been saying for a century. Children do what is done in front of them. The interesting question is which of the things done in front of them survives into the next household.
What dies is, generally, the explicit instruction. What survives is the unmarked practice. The Larkin grandmother could not have told her granddaughter, in 1968, that she was teaching her something. She was making a cake.
Some things break. The Larkin recipe box was, for fourteen years, lost. The middle generation, going through an estate after a death in 1989, packed it into a box marked kitchen and put it in a basement in Greensboro. It was rediscovered, in 2003, when a niece was clearing the same basement.
It was returned to the family kitchen. The cards were brittle. Some were illegible. The niece, who had had no particular interest in cake, transcribed the worst of them by hand, in pencil, onto new cards, so that the recipes would survive the originals.
Her own daughter, now eleven, is the one who wrote the applesauce-pancake card. She does not know that the recipe box once spent fourteen years in a basement. She knows that it lives on top of the refrigerator. That is enough.
There is a thing parents and grandparents sometimes try, which is to formalize the transmission. They write a memoir. They sit the grandchildren down and explain the history. They make a video of an interview.
Reiman's data, modestly, suggests these efforts do not work as well as people hope. The grandchild who is told to listen often does not listen. The grandchild who is invited to roll out a pie crust beside a grandmother absorbs something durable, without intent.
This is not a counsel of inaction. It is a counsel of patience. The recipe box is a recipe box. It only becomes an heirloom by being used long enough that someone notices, after the fact, that it has been one.
There are families with no recipe box. There are families with a tool box, a card table, a Saturday afternoon walk, a way of taking tea. These are the same thing under different objects. The thing is the repetition. The object is the proof.
The Larkin family does not own anything valuable. Their oldest object, by appraised dollar amount, is a wedding ring that was sold in 1956 to pay a heating bill. Their oldest object that they still have, and that anyone alive remembers, is the recipe box.
The granddaughter who wrote the pancake card, asked what she might leave to her own children one day, said, after thinking about it for a minute, that she would like to leave them the box. She said it the way a child says a thing she has not been told to say. She had figured it out on her own.
Filed under
